Updated - 22 October 2018
Copyright - G P Sagar 2015
The Plato Gap
There are no perfect men in this world, only perfect intentions.
Robin Hood
The Scene was Set Long Ago !
“They
are
to
be
gentlemen,
unsullied
by
trade
and
the
menial
labours
of
agriculture
and
craftsmanship:
and
they
are
to
follow
the
gentleman's
calling
of
public
service
in
the
administration
and
the
army.
Whereas
the
civilian,
with
his
vulgar
interests
in
his
craft,
in
money-making
and
in
family-
life,
is
a
natural
subject,
the
ruler,
conscious
of
the
the
social
responsibility
which
higher
intellectual
and
moral
capacities
bring is a natural gentleman.”
Being
attributed
as
the
father
of
western
philosophy
Plato
has
to
be
responsible
for
the
division
between
the
academic
and
practical
spheres
within
our
society.
Contemporary
philosophy
through
our
universities
sadly
perpetuates
this
status,
and
even
amplifies
it.
The
notion
that
someone
who
works
with
their
hands
is
somehow
inferior
is
forefront
in
our
everyday concerns.
Our
society
has
never
been
a
to
shake
off
this
concept
of
and
the
division
between
the
academic
world
and
the
practical.
Considerable
blame
must
be
levelled
at
our
universities
which
have
prompted
early
times
have
been
aloof
from
the
general
public.
The
concept
of
'ordinary
people'having
the
capacity
of
abstract
thinking
has
always
been
stifled.
The
reasons
for
this
are
too
complex
for
discussion
here.
The
fact
remains
that
the
craftsman
before
he
can
execute
his
exquisite
masterpiece
has
to
expend
much
effort
and
mental
agility
in
planning
his
work
which
quite
likely
would
tax
many
respected academics.
I
cannot
emphasize
just
how
serious
the
situation
is
regarding
the
academic
sphere.
The
academics
of
our
time,
and
indeed
those
of
generations
past,
just
do
not
listen
or
hear
or
even
tempt
to
understand
the
arguments
relating
to
craftsmanship
or
the
practical
people
who
pursue
technological
goals.
There
is
something
of
a
physical
barrier
when
the
subject
is
aired
within
professional
circles.
This
I
come
across
time
and
time
again,
even
with
close
family
members,
particularly when discussing teaching, learning, and training.
I,
Theophilus,
an
humble
priest,
servant
of
the
servants
of
God,
unworthy
of
the
name
and
profession
of
a
monk,
to
all
wishing
to
overcome
or
avoid
sloth
of
the
mind
or
wandering
of
the
soul,
by
useful
manual
occupation
and
the
delightful
contemplation of novelties, send a recompense of heavenly price.
(THE TREATISE of THEOPHILUS, also called RUGERUS, UPON VARIOUS ARTS,)
As
shown
in
the
previous
section,
back
in
early
times
there
was
obvious
discussion
concerning
the
role
which
individuals
had
within
society.
In
fact
the
Greeks
in
these
times
were
immersed
in
philosophical
ideas,
and
the
structure
of
society.
Plato
made
it
very
clear
that
in
his
ideal
society
people
who
worked
with
their
hands
and
laboured
were
to
be
regarded
as
of
a
lower
class.
Owing
to
the
prominence
of
these
individual
they
were
listened
to
and
the
class
system
took
hold
with
the
result
that
it
was
perpetuated around most of the world continuing right up to this very day.
Our own education system is designed to perpetuate this ideal.
A fifteen year old dislexic student produces this superb example of a working model to go on and win an adult
competition. How can you equate this with the elevated status of the ‘academic’ when considering the eliments of
planning, understanding the visual communication, the spacial awareness, and all the other attributes of a craftsman in
the making.